Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100% nano nitrogen gave highest starch percentage at 13.18 %.

A claim from Effect of soil amendments and nano and conventional nitrogen on potato yield and tuber quality · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% nano nitrogen gave highest starch percentage at 13.18 %.

Treatment
100 % nano nitrogene0
Outcome
starch percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.18 %e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen treatment with 100 % nano nitrogen produced the highest average dry matter percentage, starch percentage and protein percentage in tubers, average weight of marketable tuber and marketable yield (19.28 %, 13.18 %, 15.40 %, 119.30 g tuber-1 and 47.777 mg ha-1 respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1512
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70

Title

Effect of soil amendments and nano and conventional nitrogen on potato yield and tuber quality

H A Wissam; R S Bassam Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13607

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ab72eb951df328f3e6e93383dd1e207d8778d53d504f3e66767ed350e289148c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.