Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 140 kg N ha-1 supply gave tubers with high dry matter and starch.

A claim from Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilization to Improve Qualitative Performances and Physiological and Yield Responses of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 140 kg N ha-1 supply gave tubers with high dry matter and starch.

Material
Bellinie2
Treatment
140 kg N ha−1e5
Outcome
dry matter, starche3
Direction
high levelse3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Potato is often produced by adopting high nitrogen (N) external inputs to maximize its yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92
e2

“tuber chemical composition of cv. Bellini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–489
e5

“regardless of year and as compared to N0 and N280, the supply of 140 kg N ha−1 also ensured the highest yield and an intermediate value of the nitrogen use efficiency (59.1 t ha−1 and 37.1 kg tuber dry weight kg N−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–987
e3

“high levels of dry matter, starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1090

Title

Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilization to Improve Qualitative Performances and Physiological and Yield Responses of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Sara Lombardo; Gaetano Pandino; Giovanni Mauromicale Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10030352

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e9fdda643f8b005f87a572089746acddf75992c833aac490acf7c773df713b0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.