Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined biofertilizers and NPK under N3 increased maize grain potassium uptake by 18.1 and 31.1%.

A claim from EFFECT OF MINERAL AND BIO-FERTILIZATION ON NPK AVAILABILITY, UPTAKE, AND MAIZE YIELD. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biofertilizers and NPK under N3 increased maize grain potassium uptake by 18.1 and 31.1%.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
Combination of A.chroococcum, B.megatherium, and NPK fertilizers under N3e0
Outcome
N, P, and K uptake by maize graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.1 and 31.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of A.chroococcum, B.megatherium, and NPK fertilizers under N3 significantly increased grain yield (20.9 and 17.9%), straw yield (16.8 and 20.6%), 100-grain weight (9.9 and 13.3%), ear weight (21.0 and 18.0) and N, P, and K uptake by maize grain [(35.1 and 31.3%), (21.2 and 26.9%) and (18.1 and 31.1%)] over the control for N, P, and K, respectively, in 2007 and 2008 seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1447
t0

“MAIZE YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84

Title

EFFECT OF MINERAL AND BIO-FERTILIZATION ON NPK AVAILABILITY, UPTAKE, AND MAIZE YIELD.

Asmaa A. El-Basuony; E. A. Belal; A. A. E. Atwa Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2009. doi:10.21608/jssae.2009.93134

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-acfa92033f2d2a2cbb592facd3b3a76868f738a5020ea924c05fcc35fd5274a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter chroococcum · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.