Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 30% ethanol extract of roselle always had the highest radical-scavenging activity.

A claim from Antioxidant capacity of extracts from calyx fruits of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30% ethanol extract of roselle always had the highest radical-scavenging activity.

Treatment
extract in 30% ethanole0
Outcome
radical-scavenging activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
alwayse0
Comparator
extract in 95% ethanole0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Antioxidant capacity of extracts from calyx fruits of roselle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61
e0

“The results show that the extract in 30% ethanol always had the highest radical-scavenging activity, while the extract in 95% ethanol showed the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–463

Title

Antioxidant capacity of extracts from calyx fruits of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.)

Yang Liuqing; Gou Ying; Zhao Ting; et al. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY 2012. doi:10.5897/ajb11.2227

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ad120780369ab509e90a9b2e5dcd831c9acf11f61449f30ed0a207952592221b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

ethanol · quality: phytochemicals · Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.