Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Raising PAR through a longer LP increased growth rate more than raising PFD did.

A claim from The Effect of Photon Flux Density and Lighting Period on Growth, Flowering, Powdery Mildew and Water Relations of Miniature Roses · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising PAR through a longer LP increased growth rate more than raising PFD did.

Taxon
Rosa sp.Rosae0
Treatment
by increasing the LP from 16 to 20 h·day-1e5
Outcome
growth ratee5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
more than increasing the PFD dide5
Comparator
increasing the PFDe5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Miniature roses (Rosa sp.) were grown at 100 and 150 μmol m-2·s-1 photon flux densities (PFD) with 16, 20 and 24 h·day-1 lighting periods (LP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142
e5

“Increasing the photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) by increasing the LP from 16 to 20 h·day-1 increased the growth rate more than increasing the PFD did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1184

Title

The Effect of Photon Flux Density and Lighting Period on Growth, Flowering, Powdery Mildew and Water Relations of Miniature Roses

Leiv M. Mortensen American Journal of Plant Sciences 2014. doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.513194

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-adac7f30fac03332d22a16fa65d1edac250574b6b9737da19436ce9abbc592c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

light · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.