Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till lowered reproductive leaf SPAD and mature whole-plant N after diagonal ammonia application, while parallel application showed no tillage effect.

A claim from Systems Evaluation of Shallow Anhydrous Ammonia Placements, Rates, and Timing on Maize Plant Uniformity, Yield and N Use Efficiency · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till lowered reproductive leaf SPAD and mature whole-plant N after diagonal ammonia application, while parallel application showed no tillage effect.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
reproductive-stage leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), or whole-plant N content at maturitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
after diagonal applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tillage system did not impact reproductive-stage leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), or whole-plant N content at maturity when NH3 was parallel-applied, but these plant responses were significantly lower in no-till after diagonal application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3954–4196
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Systems Evaluation of Shallow Anhydrous Ammonia Placements, Rates, and Timing on Maize Plant Uniformity, Yield and N Use Efficiency

Péter Kovács Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 2013

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-adae2cfc5a14bc2cda2c427c7d3951528040bee7016c4b8155f08fb14b85f51e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.