Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Onion bulb extract at 10% gave a higher maize yield in the field, 30.50 q/ha, than the untreated control of 25.00 q/ha.

A claim from Efficacy of bio-agents, botanical extracts and essential oils against southern leaf blight of maize (Zea mays L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb extract at 10% gave a higher maize yield in the field, 30.50 q/ha, than the untreated control of 25.00 q/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Onion bulb @ 10 %e3
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
30.50 q/hae3
Qualifier
25.00 q/hae2
Comparator
untreated controle2
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“southern leaf blight of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99
e0

“under field conditions was assessed during Rabi season 2018-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1007
e1

“the maximum yield of maize was recorded in Mancozeb @ 0.2% (41.66q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1105
e2

“as compared to the untreated control(25.00 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1374
e3

“Onion bulb @ 10 % (30.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1325

Title

Efficacy of bio-agents, botanical extracts and essential oils against southern leaf blight of maize (Zea mays L.)

Thorlapati Vijaya Vardhan; Sobita Simon; Sunil Zacharia Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ae0fa3ec15391928c212f6a7feb028fc6f9cf0a245b7eab01ed38e43c043a7cc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

Allium cepa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.