Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three sprays raised April-planted beet yield by 9 tons per acre.

A claim from Sprays for Aphid Control Increase Sugar Beet Yields in Davis Tests · 1965

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three sprays raised April-planted beet yield by 9 tons per acre.

Taxon
beetsBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
Three sprayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
9e0
Qualifier
Aprile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays applied to beets planted in March, April or May, 1964, resulted in yield increases of 6, 9 and 5 tons per acre respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–313

Title

Sprays for Aphid Control Increase Sugar Beet Yields in Davis Tests

F. J. Hills; W. Lange; R Loomis; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 1965

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ae4cee5c7a4bd9ee6c45fe595e180a5f2e969796bbbda33b9fee9d78d3b577ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Spraying with copper or captan did not increase the yield of uninoculated sugar beet plants.

    The control of Alternaria species on leaves of sugar beet infected with yellowing viruses · 1965

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Boron spraying time reportedly had no considerable effect on tops dry weight, sugar loss %, sugar loss yield and some impurity concentrations.

    Effect Concentration and Spraying Time of Boron on Yield and Quality Traits of Sugar Beet Grown in Newly Reclaimed Soil Conditions · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Daminozide did not affect plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.

    Harvesting sugar-beet seed · 1974

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar insecticides had little or no effect on root yield.

    Foliar insecticides for the control of curly top in Idaho sugar beet, 2017 · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Delaying foliar yeast spraying from 60 to 70 and 90 days after sowing decreased root and sugar yields.

    EFFECT OF FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION DATES OF YEAST (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) ON SUGAR BEET PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY · 2015

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar dressing with microelements had practically no effect on sugar beet seed yield.

    INFLUENCE OF BASIC MINERAL FERTILIZER AND FOLIAR FEEDING WITH MICROELEMENTS ON SUGAR BEET SEEDS YIELD, STRUCTURE AND QUALITY · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    FarmDroid with spot spraying would cost slightly more than conventional surface spraying.

    Climate impact, toxicological risks and economic efficiency of conventional and new weed control methods in sugar beet · 2024 · compared with conventional surface spraying

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Broadcast solid and sprayed liquid fertilizer gave equal sugar yields.

    Comparisons of liquid and solid fertilizers and anhydrous ammonia for sugar beet · 1970 · compared with broadcast solid

    No difference from an alternative

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.