Claim · model-written summary
Terminating irrigation reduced grain yield by 29% relative to controls.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- termination of irrigatione1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 29%e0
- Comparator
- controlse2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat cultivars”
e0“grain yield (29%)”
e1“termination of irrigation led to a reduction”
e2“in comparison to the controls”
Title
Saeed Samsami; Foroud Bazrafshan; Mahdi Zare; et al. Acta Agrobotanica 2019. doi:10.5586/aa.1788
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Yield parameters differed across irrigation, urea application rates and cultivars.
- Association Location, irrigation, cultivar and urea interactions were significant for Chl b, 1,000-seed weight and seed yield.
- Intervention effect Terminating irrigation reduced RWC by 20% relative to controls.
- Intervention effect Terminating irrigation reduced total chlorophyll content by 30% relative to controls.
- Intervention effect Terminating irrigation reduced carotenoids by 19% relative to controls.
- Intervention effect Terminating irrigation reduced 1,000-seed weight by 18% relative to controls.
- Intervention effect Terminating irrigation increased ionic leakage by 17% relative to controls.
- Intervention effect Terminating irrigation increased proline accumulation by 4% relative to controls.
- Observation Chamran and Shirudi had the greatest tolerance to reduced irrigation.
- Recommendation The authors suggest 240 kg ha−1 urea may moderate adverse effects of reduced irrigation.