Claim · model-written summary
Water stress had a small effect on light interception.
- Taxon
- barley and chickpea
Cicer arietinum
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- water stresse0
- Outcome
- light interceptione0
- Direction
- small effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“barley and chickpea”
e0“water stress had a small effect on light interception but a large effect on light use efficiency”
Title
Thomas; S Fukai Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1995. doi:10.1071/ar9950017
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Barley sown in April produced a lower yield than barley sown in mid-winter, under both well-watered and water stress conditions.
- Intervention effect Chickpea in the irrigated control had its lowest yield in the July sowing at Redland Bay.
- Intervention effect Chickpea under water stress produced its lowest yield at Hermitage.
- Intervention effect Water stress severely reduced crop growth of chickpea after flowering.
- Intervention effect Early-maturing Corvette barley produced a higher grain yield than late-maturing Triumph in one water stress trial with a 40-day maturity difference.
- Intervention effect Corvette did not out-yield Triumph in the trials where the maturity difference was less than 15 days.
- Observation In most crops, water stress developed slowly during early stages of growth.
- Intervention effect Water stress had a large effect on light use efficiency.
- Intervention effect For chickpea sown in April, water stress severely reduced light interception.
- Intervention effect For chickpea sown in April, water stress had little adverse effect on light use efficiency.
- Association Whether water stress affects light interception or light use efficiency depends on the timing of water stress relative to canopy development.