Claim · model-written summary
Neither growth regulator eliminated secondary flowering shoots.
- Taxon
- pear
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communise1 - Outcome
- production of secondary flowering shootse0
- Direction
- neither growth regulator eliminatede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“neither growth regulator eliminated the production of secondary flowering shoots”
e1“Secondary flowering (bloom) shoots in 'Bartlett' pear”
Title
REDUCING SECONDARY FLOWERING IN BARTLETT PEAR TO REDUCE FIRE BLIGHT
S.M. Southwick; K. Glozer; J.T. Yeager; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2002. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2002.596.124
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Five types of secondary flowering shoots were identified in Bartlett pear.
- Association Type I and V flowering shoots were most often associated with fire blight infection.
- Observation Type I shoots appeared 10 to 40 days after full bloom.
- Observation Type V shoots were associated with pruning cuts and appeared 15 to 55 days after full bloom.
- Intervention effect Apogee applied at 250 mg.liter-1 near full bloom reduced Type I flowering shoots.
- Intervention effect GA applied in June or July reduced Type V shoots in the following season.
- Intervention effect Summer pruning reduced Type V flowering shoots compared with dormant pruning.
- Intervention effect Postharvest pruning reduced Type V flowering shoots compared with dormant pruning.
- Association Older shoots were more likely than younger shoots to produce Type V shoots.
- Intervention effect NAA on the pruned cut surface and two nodes below it inhibited Type V development.