Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Root lesions were significantly lower in the rhizosphere soil of tomato when inoculated with Pseudomonas or Bacillus than in the untreated control.

A claim from The effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on healthy plant growth of tomato affected by soil sickness. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root lesions were significantly lower in the rhizosphere soil of tomato when inoculated with Pseudomonas or Bacillus than in the untreated control.

Treatment
inoculatede3
Interactor
P. sp .e3biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42Bacillus amyloliquefaciense3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Root lesionse3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
untreated controle3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85
e3

“Root lesions was significantly lower in the rhizosphere soils of both tomato varieties when inoculated with P. sp . ”Proradix ® “ or B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–924

Title

The effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on healthy plant growth of tomato affected by soil sickness.

Yusran Yusran; Markus Weinmann; Volker Roemheld; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b5902ea17b4e3e31607630e464c2842a350aaa77c422462ea14d3a53afb8116a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this claim · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

257 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.