Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low red to far-red light induced petiole elongation and leaf hyponasty.

A claim from Light Quality-Mediated Petiole Elongation in Arabidopsis during Shade Avoidance Involves Cell Wall Modification by Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase/Hydrolases    · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low red to far-red light induced petiole elongation and leaf hyponasty.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
Treatment
low red to far-red lighte0
Outcome
petiole elongation and leaf hyponastye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In response to two shade cues, low red to far-red light (implying neighbor proximity) and green shade (mimicking dense canopy conditions), Arabidopsis showed classic shade avoidance features: petiole elongation and leaf hyponasty.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–697

Title

Light Quality-Mediated Petiole Elongation in Arabidopsis during Shade Avoidance Involves Cell Wall Modification by Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase/Hydrolases   

Rashmi Sasidharan; C.C. Chinnappa; Marten Staal; et al. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2010. doi:10.1104/pp.110.162057

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b591d3e8433e523739fe948957c30e9c940fedc65d4d6e8a0a9f27ced4904826 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

light · growth · ArabidopsisResults differ

44 papers: 27 positive, 17 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.