Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated soil boron reduced wheat yield by 7.7% on average across eight wheat cultivars in a two-year field study.

A claim from YIELD RESPONSE TO ELEVATED SOIL BORON IN WHEAT CULTIVARS OF LOCAL AND FOREIGN ORIGIN · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated soil boron reduced wheat yield by 7.7% on average across eight wheat cultivars in a two-year field study.

Material
eight wheat cultivarse2
Treatment
elevated soil borone3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
7.7%e3
Setting
two-year field studye1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The two-year field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24
e2

“on eight wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–152
e3

“On average, wheat yield response to elevated soil boron was decrease of 7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–433

Title

YIELD RESPONSE TO ELEVATED SOIL BORON IN WHEAT CULTIVARS OF LOCAL AND FOREIGN ORIGIN

MILKA BRDAR-JOKANOVIĆ; ANKICA KONDIĆ-ŠPIKA; BRANKA LJEVNAIĆ-MAŠIĆ; et al. FiVeR (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia) 2014. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5876676

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-b59d11df7c9d9d7b96b85b9a7db36a61c3d0852bed7950d52c41beb3b3ff5cd4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Under field drought, foliar boron increased grain yield by 19%.

    Alleviation of drought stress in winter wheat by late foliar application of zinc, boron, and manganese · 2012

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    B deficiency reduced grains per spikelet in both genotypes, more in SW41.

    Boron Deficiency in Two Wheat Genotypes in a Warm, Subtropical Region · 1994

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
    Boron application significantly increased wheat Number of grains per spike.

    Yield response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to boron application at different growth stages · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Under normal irrigation, boron spraying at booting stage gave the highest mean spike length of 11.86 and 11.72 cm in the two seasons, compared with other boron application times in wheat.

    Improvement of wheat yield grown under drought stress by boron foliar application at different growth stages · 2016 · compared with boron application time

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Boron application increased bread wheat grain yield by 10.9% on average.

    Responses of Irrigated Durum and Bread Wheat Cultivars to Boron Application in a Low Boron Calcareous Soil · 2005

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Soil boron improved wheat grain yield.

    Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Foliar zinc and boron significantly increased spikes per area, grains per spike and thousand grain weight compared with controls.

    Enhancement of wheat grain yield and yield components through foliar application of zinc and boron. · 2009 · compared with both control treatments

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Foliar P + K + B produced longer spikes.

    Integrated Foliar Nutrients Application Improve Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Productivity under Calcareous Soils in Drylands · 2021

    Opposite direction

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.