Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Consortium inoculation outperformed individual inoculation on wheat growth and Zn solubility.

A claim from Growth improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and zinc biofortification using potent zinc-solubilizing bacteria · 2023

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation outperformed individual inoculation on wheat growth and Zn solubility.

Treatment
inoculation of these strains in consortiume0
Outcome
growth and Zn solubility for wheate0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
individual inoculatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present study concluded that the selected bacterial strains show the potential to act as ZSB and are highly efficient bio-inoculants to combat Zn deficiency, and the inoculation of these strains in consortium performed better in terms of growth and Zn solubility for wheat as compared to individual inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2894–3209

Title

Growth improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and zinc biofortification using potent zinc-solubilizing bacteria

Murad Ali; Iftikhar Ahmed; Hamza Tariq; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1140454

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-b646ec5000c7e25cc962ade14e968f2a960561a48c4bb1c96fd7e40732f8b29a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this claim · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

523 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.