Claim · model-written summary
Micro-Tom and the commercial variety had similar chromatographic profiles.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Micro-Tome0
- Outcome
- chromatographic profilese0
- Comparator
- commercial varietye0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chromatographic profiles of Micro-Tom were similar to those of the commercial variety and the only differences appear to be the concentration of the components.”
t0“tomato”
Title
Pilar Flores; Virginia Hernández; Pilar Hellín; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2015. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7256
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Salinity increased Micro-Tom sugars less than in Optima.
- Intervention effect Salinity increased Micro-Tom organic acids less than in Optima.
- Intervention effect Salinity did not increase phenolic compounds in Micro-Tom.
- Intervention effect Salinity did not increase vitamin C in Micro-Tom.
- Intervention effect Salinity increased carotenoids similarly in both varieties.
- Intervention effect N, K and Ca limitation did not affect Micro-Tom fruit yield.
- Intervention effect N, K and Ca limitation did not affect most Micro-Tom metabolite concentrations.