Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 100 mg/L, 50 nm ZnO nanoparticles halved wheat root length.

A claim from Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Affect Early Seedlings’ Growth and Polar Metabolite Profiles of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 mg/L, 50 nm ZnO nanoparticles halved wheat root length.

Treatment
ZnO NPs (50 nm) at the lowest concentration (100 mg/L)e0
Outcome
length of the wheat rootse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2-folde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The more toxic ZnO NPs (50 nm) at the lowest concentration (100 mg/L) caused a 2-fold decrease in the length of the wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–707

Title

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Affect Early Seedlings’ Growth and Polar Metabolite Profiles of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Karolina Stałanowska; Joanna Szablińska-Piernik; Adam Okorski; et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023. doi:10.3390/ijms241914992

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-b6ddfc0ae5c0f653d14c08544a2585348ee56542508ae66a1cb616e35e294576 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc oxide · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.