Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc produced the maximum grain yield of 41.4 q/ ha in 2011-12, versus 39.0 q/ ha for control.

A claim from Contribution of liquid fertilizers to improve productivity of late sown wheat in western plain zone of Uttar Pradesh · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc produced the maximum grain yield of 41.4 q/ ha in 2011-12, versus 39.0 q/ ha for control.

Treatment
zinc applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41.4 q/ hae0
Qualifier
39.0 q/ hae0
Comparator
control treatmente0
Setting
Muzaffarnagar districtof Uttar Pradeshe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (41.4 q/ ha) was recorded from zinc application and lowest (39.0 q/ ha) from control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1210
e1

“The field experiments were conducted in Muzaffarnagar districtof Uttar Pradesh in winter of 2011-12 and 2012-13 to estimate the effect of liquid applied nutrients on the yield of late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194
e2

“zinc application was significantly increased yield over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1467

Title

Contribution of liquid fertilizers to improve productivity of late sown wheat in western plain zone of Uttar Pradesh

SANJEEV KUMAR; A.K. KATIYAR; ANUJ KUMAR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2015. doi:10.15740/has/ijas/11.1/161-165

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-b7248e243d18e33ba375999917e6ca02db8a24b9a3ca628c8e3f3848ee6b7c63 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.