Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Neither sowing date nor rainwater conservation significantly increased barley dry matter.

A claim from Effect of In-situ Rainwater Conservations and Sowing Date on Barley Yield and Weed Infestation: A Case study at Maychew and Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither sowing date nor rainwater conservation significantly increased barley dry matter.

Treatment
sowing-dates nor the in-situ rainwater conservation measurese0
Outcome
dry-mattere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither of the sowing-dates nor the in-situ rainwater conservation measures had significantly increased the dry-matter of a barley crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1156

Title

Effect of In-situ Rainwater Conservations and Sowing Date on Barley Yield and Weed Infestation: A Case study at Maychew and Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia

Abrham Tezera Gessesse; Araya Alemie Berhe Malaysian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2015. doi:10.18034/mjmbr.v2i1.387

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b757d2e06ff4fff49ce4d38270bf37be7a786eec268a813f86708da642006c3d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

rainfall · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sowing time · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.