Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF inoculation and phosphorus application increased onion growth and bulb traits.

A claim from MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZERS TO IMPROVE ONION PRODUCTIVITY IN SALINE SOIL · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation and phosphorus application increased onion growth and bulb traits.

Taxon
ONIONAllium cepat0
Treatment
inoculation of AMF and phosphorus applicatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
height, leaf number, fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological traits of plant (height, leaf number, fresh and dry weight), neck diameter, bulb characters (diameter and weight), total soluble sugars (TSS), protein, P content increased, while proline content decreased due to the inoculation of AMF and phosphorus application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–952
t0

“ONION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67

Title

MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZERS TO IMPROVE ONION PRODUCTIVITY IN SALINE SOIL

Mansour El-Sayed Ramadan Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 2019. doi:10.24326/asphc.2019.1.6

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b787b7df2dcd6c65f9b6562efd3bd4c184023af7659359f20f522832e81b770d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

53 papers: 48 positive, 5 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.