Claim · model-written summary
The maximal dry matter accumulation under conservation tillage patterns was in the order B2, B1, B3.
- Treatment
- conservation tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- maximal dry matter accumulation quantitye0
- Direction
- maximale0
- Qualifier
- B2B1B3e0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“The maximal dry matter accumulation quantity of conservation tillage patterns are appeared B2B1B3”
Title
Hou Li-bai Yumi kexue 2007
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Treatment B1 under conservation tillage increased maize production by 12% compared with CK.
- Intervention effect Treatment B2 under conservation tillage increased maize production by 13.6% compared with CK.
- Intervention effect Treatment B3 under conservation tillage increased maize production by 7.8% compared with CK.
- Intervention effect Dry matter accumulation and plant height under conservation tillage were lower than under traditional tillage in the primary growth stage.
- Intervention effect Dry matter accumulation and plant height under conservation tillage exceeded those under traditional tillage after the jointing stage.
- Intervention effect The order of plant height among tillage patterns was B3, CK, B1, B2.
- Intervention effect Grain filling speed had an advantage among conservation tillage patterns after pollination.
- Intervention effect Spike characters such as number of rows and grain number under conservation tillage had an advantage over traditional tillage.
- Intervention effect Treatment B2 was higher than CK in spike characters by 0.85 and 1.40 percentage.