Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T10 produced the maximum plant height of 56.83 cm, 39.5% above control, and was statistically at par with T9, T7, and T8.

A claim from Optimizing Growth and Productivity of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) through Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 produced the maximum plant height of 56.83 cm, 39.5% above control, and was statistically at par with T9, T7, and T8.

Treatment
100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + PSB (T₁₀)e1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
maximume1
Value
56.83 cme1
Qualifier
39.5%e1
Comparator
control (T₁)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–494
e1

“The results revealed that the maximum plant height (56.83 cm), number of branches per plant (6.18) and dry matter accumulation (15.65 g plant⁻¹) were recorded under 100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + PSB (T₁₀), which remained statistically at par with T₉, T₇ and T₈ and exhibited increases of 39.5%, 41.7% and 61.7% over the control (T₁), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–1043

Title

Optimizing Growth and Productivity of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) through Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies

Anil Kumar Gauttam; Y. A. Tamboli; Ajeet Singh; et al. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 2026. doi:10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i54185

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-b875c191e30effffc9982e1a3733e394cebb9be6b9ee21471e62f3ad11b44ee4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.