Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Late sown lentil and NT treatments had higher penetration resistance of 2.51 MPa than early sown lentil and NT.

A claim from Assessment and mitigation of soil water stress of rainfed lentil (Lens culinaries Medik) through sowing time, tillage and potassic fertilization disparities · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sown lentil and NT treatments had higher penetration resistance of 2.51 MPa than early sown lentil and NT.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Late sown lentil and NTe4
Outcome
penetration resistance (PR)e4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
2.51 MPae4
Comparator
early sown lentil and NTe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lentil (Lens culinaries Medik)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–58
e4

“Late sown lentil and NT treatments possessed higher bulk density (BD) of 1.52 and 1.55 Mg m−3 and penetration resistance (PR) of 2.51 MPa than early sown lentil and NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1712

Title

Assessment and mitigation of soil water stress of rainfed lentil (Lens culinaries Medik) through sowing time, tillage and potassic fertilization disparities

R. Nandi; S. Mukherjee; P.K. Bandyopadhyay; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108120

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-b95cc5f14ffb610ec3fd4f39491e01c047158cfd46a32fddf457be9de8649a1a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.