Intervention effectmodel-written summary

N-26 with NPS at 150 kg ha-1 by drilling gave the greatest dry biomass, 4273.7 kg ha-1.

A claim from Response of Mung Bean Varieties (Vigna radiata L.) to Application Rates and Methods of Blended NPS Fertilizer at Humbo · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-26 with NPS at 150 kg ha-1 by drilling gave the greatest dry biomass, 4273.7 kg ha-1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Material
N-26e5
Treatment
fertilizer composed of NPS at 150 kg ha−1 using the drill application methode5
Outcome
dry biomasse5
Direction
greateste5
Value
4273.7 kg ha−1e5

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“performance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–462
e5

“The greatest dry biomass (4273.7 kg ha−1) and grain yield (1539.2 kg ha−1) were produced by N-26 variety with fertilizer composed of NPS at 150 kg ha−1 using the drill application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1276

Title

Response of Mung Bean Varieties (Vigna radiata L.) to Application Rates and Methods of Blended NPS Fertilizer at Humbo

Fekadu Mekonen Mota; Dereje Shanka Balla; Mesfin Bibiso Doda International Journal of Agronomy 2021. doi:10.1155/2021/3786720

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b9a44d34eaad41de0175bcfb10820d83167426d0c784dc3169b543f0c35a35ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

transplanting · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.