Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chili pepper showed no response to methanol sprays.

A claim from 548 PB 096 EFFECT OF METHANOL ON BIOMASS ACCUMULATION AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC EFFICIENCY OF VEGETABLE CROPS IN HAWAII · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chili pepper showed no response to methanol sprays.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicume4
Treatment
methanol sprayse4
Outcome
response to methanol sprayse4
Direction
no responsee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Okra, chili pepper, and eggplant showed no response to methanol sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1296

Title

548 PB 096 EFFECT OF METHANOL ON BIOMASS ACCUMULATION AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC EFFICIENCY OF VEGETABLE CROPS IN HAWAII

Hector R. Valenzuela; Osamu Kawabata; Harry Yamamoto HortScience 1994. doi:10.21273/hortsci.29.5.510a

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ba440333c58e23859afb8d28b6e1290574f5f644d241b558b1780a5a0185e9e2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

application · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.