Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Artificial fertilizers and residues of the preceding crop did not significantly affect spring barley yield.

A claim from EFFICIENCY OF FERTILIZATION AND SOIL CULTIVATION IN CROP ROTATION · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial fertilizers and residues of the preceding crop did not significantly affect spring barley yield.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree5
Treatment
artificial fertilizers and the residues of the preceding crope5
Outcome
yielde5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The effect of the artificial fertilizers and the residues of the preceding crop on yield of corn, spring barley and pea did not show statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1109

Title

EFFICIENCY OF FERTILIZATION AND SOIL CULTIVATION IN CROP ROTATION

Candráková; Pospišil; Ondrejčíková Journal of Central European Agriculture 2008. doi:10.5513/jcea.v9i3.700

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-ba5f8a2731bf8aabba2c40d26f632d58bfd65ecbca9cbdb31daa941bd5897529 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

rotation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Optimal cultural practices increased barley biomass and seed yield, especially at low herbicide rates.

    Integrating Cropping Systems with Cultural Techniques Augments Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Management in Barley · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Barley yields were 16–19% higher in the AER system than in the CG system.

    Improved soil quality and barley yields with fababeans, manure, forages and crop rotation on a Gray Luvisol · 1994 · compared with CG system

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Diverse rotations with more broad-leaved crops had higher yields.

    Managing crop losses from foliar diseases with fungicides, rotation, and tillage in the Saskatchewan Parkland · 2000 · compared with rotations with fewer broad-leaved crops and less crop diversity

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Barley seed yield was 26% greater in barley-forage rotation than monoculture except in 1995.

    Manure, Tillage, and Crop Rotation: Effects on Residual Weed Interference in Spring Barley Cropping Systems · 1998 · compared with monoculture

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Rotation yields were higher than monoculture on clay, without statistical significance.

    Response of Spring Barley to Crop Rotation, Conservation Tillage, and Weed Management Intensity · 1997 · compared with monoculture

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Barley yielded most after fallow.

    Yields of crop dry matter and nitrogen in long-term barley rotation trials at two sites in northern Syria · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Feed legume rotations yielded 29% more total biomass than barley-only rotations at one site.

    Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 1. Comparison of rotations · 2000 · compared with barley-only rotations

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    The diverse rotation with the higher barley seeding rate gave higher barley yields than continuous barley at the lower seeding rate.

    Combining Cultural Practices with Herbicides Reduces Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Seed in the Soil Seed Bank and Improves Barley Yield · 2013 · compared with continuous barley and lower barley seeding rate (suboptimal cultural practice)

    Opposite direction

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this claim · 473 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Nanotechnology fertilizer products increased barley yield.

    Impact of foliar application of nano micronutrient fertilizers and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the growth and yield components of barley under supplemental irrigation · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer increased grain yield at all sites and years.

    Growth, water use and yield of barley in Mediterranean-type environments · 1987

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    CO2 fertilization with adjusted sowing may slightly increase current barley cultivar yields under most scenarios on favourable soils.

    Modelling shifts in agroclimate and crop cultivar response under climate change · 2013

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Manure raised barley yield by 22% on average.

    Mineral and organic fertilization efficiency in long-term stationary experiments · 2010

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Fertilizer nitrogen increased yield of the remaining crop across the application range.

    Modelling and measurement of the effects of fertilizer‐N and crop residue incorporation on N‐dynamics in vegetable cropping · 1996

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Compost raised barley grain yield by 12%.

    Effect of compost and manure soil amendments on nematodes and on yields of potato and barley: a 7-year study. · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Barley yield with an additional 100 kg N/ha top dressing was 4·1 t/ha, higher than with the seed-bed application of 45 kg N/ha.

    Comparison of crop yields and soil conditions during 30 years under annual tillage or grazed pasture · 1990 · compared with seed-bed application of 45 kg N/ha

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Under irrigation, manure increased barley yield.

    Barley Performance under Heavy Applications of Cattle Feedlot Manure · 1993

    Opposite direction

541 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.