Claim · model-written summary
At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
- Taxon
- Coffea arabica
Coffea arabicat0 - Interactor
- Leucoptera coffeella
Leucoptera coffeellae1pest - Outcome
- lossese0
- Value
- up to 6.56%e0
- Qualifier
- up to 15% mined leavese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“low densities (up to 15% mined leaves) of the pest that caused losses of up to 6.56%”
e1“Leucoptera coffeella”
t0“Coffea arabica”
Title
Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
- Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
- Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
- Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
- Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
- Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
- Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
- Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
- Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.