Claim · model-written summary
Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
- Taxon
- Coffea arabica
Coffea arabicat0 - Treatment
- manual > drone > airplane > tractor applicatione0
- Outcome
- control coste0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The decreasing order of control cost was manual > drone > airplane > tractor application.”
t0“Coffea arabica”
Title
Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
- Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
- Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
- Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
- Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
- Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
- Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
- Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
- Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.