Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed yields were comparable between conventional and reduced tillage fields.

A claim from The crack fertilization technique effectively increases soybean production in upland fields converted from paddies · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yields were comparable between conventional and reduced tillage fields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
reduced tillage fieldse0
Outcome
Seed yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
conventionale0
Setting
upland field converted from the paddye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yields in conventional and reduced tillage fields were comparable in the upland field converted from the paddy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1085
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–63

Title

The crack fertilization technique effectively increases soybean production in upland fields converted from paddies

Koji Yamane; Yoshitsugu Fudano; Nobuyuki Takao; et al. Plant Production Science 2020. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2020.1743188

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-bb2f172f2faad81a0f6b8965187fd739801005ea6abd4503b27c5a205e0381bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this claim · 264 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.