Claim · model-written summary
Cd concentrations generally ranked bark, leaf, root, then stem.
- Outcome
- Bark > Leaf > Root > Steme0
PopulusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it followed a general order as Bark > Leaf > Root > Stem.”
t0“poplar”
t1“poplar”
Title
Comparison of cadmium accumulation in upright and leaning poplar trees
Gong Rong; Yin Chu; Shengquan Liu; et al. BioResources 2021. doi:10.15376/biores.16.2.3422-3436
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Both upright and leaning poplar tolerated soil Cd stress, despite significant inhibition from Cd application.
- Observation Leaning poplar had significantly lower height and basal diameter growth than upright poplar.
- Association Cd concentrations across poplar parts increased with soil Cd.
- Observation Poplar parts had average BCF values from 0.08 to 2.36.
- Observation Poplar parts had average TF values from 0.67 to 7.92.
- Observation Leaning poplar had higher average Cd concentration, BCF and TF than upright poplar, without a significant difference.
- Observation Tension-zone stem wood in leaning poplar had significantly higher Cd than the opposite zone.