Claim · model-written summary
Both upright and leaning poplar tolerated soil Cd stress, despite significant inhibition from Cd application.
- Treatment
- Cd applicatione0
- Outcome
- considerable tolerance of both upright poplar (UP) and leaning poplar (LP)e0
- Direction
- inhibitione0
PopulusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated considerable tolerance of both upright poplar (UP) and leaning poplar (LP) to Cd stress in the soil, though with significant inhibition from Cd application.”
Title
Comparison of cadmium accumulation in upright and leaning poplar trees
Gong Rong; Yin Chu; Shengquan Liu; et al. BioResources 2021. doi:10.15376/biores.16.2.3422-3436
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Observation Leaning poplar had significantly lower height and basal diameter growth than upright poplar.
- Association Cd concentrations across poplar parts increased with soil Cd.
- Observation Cd concentrations generally ranked bark, leaf, root, then stem.
- Observation Poplar parts had average BCF values from 0.08 to 2.36.
- Observation Poplar parts had average TF values from 0.67 to 7.92.
- Observation Leaning poplar had higher average Cd concentration, BCF and TF than upright poplar, without a significant difference.
- Observation Tension-zone stem wood in leaning poplar had significantly higher Cd than the opposite zone.