Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The K3S60 combination gave the highest grain yield, 10.81 t/ha.

A claim from The effect of sulphur and lime dosage application on grain yield of hybrid maize · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K3S60 combination gave the highest grain yield, 10.81 t/ha.

Taxon
hybrid maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K3S60 (600 kg/ha lime and 60 t/ha S fertilizer)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.81 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was obtained with lime and S fertilizer at the dose of K3S60 (600 kg/ha lime and 60 t/ha S fertilizer) showing the highest yield of 10.81 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1012
t0

“hybrid maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80

Title

The effect of sulphur and lime dosage application on grain yield of hybrid maize

F. Tabri; Syafruddin; M. Aqil; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/911/1/012036

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-bb59e4684f18cabe96140a69489c6bce9cac0a0d45dcb301d91829ce4c6b78e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Maize grain yield did not respond to sulphur application.

    Yield-limiting plant nutrients for maize production in northwest Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Across sites, fertilized and zero-sulfur plots had similar yields.

    Fertilizer Sulfur Effects on Corn Yield and Plant Sulfur Concentration · 1995 · compared with zero S treatment

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Straw mulch did not significantly change yield.

    Transparent and Black Film Mulching Improve Photosynthesis and Yield of Summer Maize in North China Plain · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Straw incorporation (S) did not affect maize grain yield relative to control.

    Effects of coupling film-mulched furrow-ridge cropping with maize straw soil- incorporation on maize yields and soil organic carbon pool at a semiarid loess site of China · 2012 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Humic acid and sulfur did not significantly affect number of kernels per raw at Qlyasan.

    EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID AND SULFUR FERTILIZER LEVELS ON SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS OF MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) ON CALCAREOUS SOIL · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Sulfur fertilization did not improve corn grain yield.

    Alfalfa and corn response to sulfur fertilization on three Pennsylvania soils · 1984

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Increased soil sulphur levels reduced maize growth and dry matter yield through intense acidification.

    The performance of maize crop during acid amelioration with organic residues in soils of Mtwara, Tanzania · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    The 100% and 50% S applied to mustard had no significant residual effect on maize grain, stover and biological yields.

    Conservation agriculture, nitrogen and residual sulphur effects on maize (Zea mays) growth and yield in a long-term maize-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) system · 2023

    Opposite direction

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Lime and PG additions had no long-term effect on maize yield.

    Lime and phosphogypsum application and sulfate retention in subtropical soils under no-till system · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Fertilization without lime significantly decreased soil pH and crop yield relative to fertilization with lime in 2012–2018.

    Interaction of liming and long-term fertilization increased crop yield and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) through mediating exchangeable cations in acidic soil under wheat–maize cropping system · 2020 · compared with fertilizer with lime treatments

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Maize yields showed no statistically confirmed difference between the 10 and 15 t/ha dolomite treatments.

    IMPACTS OF LIMING BY DOLOMITE ON THE MAIZE AND BARLEY GRAIN YIELDS · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Maize grain yield did not respond to lime application.

    Yield-limiting plant nutrients for maize production in northwest Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Liming had no clear effect on soil K, maize leaf N, Cu, Fe and Zn, or on maize grain yield.

    Effects of liming and inorganic fertiliser application on soil properties and maize growth and yield in rural agriculture in the Mbizana area, Eastern Cape province, South Africa · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Corn yield did not vary with lime rates.

    Liming and electrochemical attributes of an oxisol under no tillage · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Liming negatively affected shoot and root dry matter production of maize.

    Ammonium Fertilization Enhances Nutrient Uptake, Specifically Manganese and Zinc, and Growth of Maize in Unlimed and Limed Acidic Sandy Soil · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Lime and micronutrients did not alleviate the affected yield.

    Tillage and Fertilization of Corn Grown on Lespedeza Sod1 · 1973

    Opposite direction

210 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    SSNM yield with or without ICM was significantly higher than farmer fertilizer practice.

    Site Specific Nutrient Management for Maize on Ultisols Lampung · 2018 · compared with FFP

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    If the V8 sufficiency index was below 90%, in-season nitrogen application did not attain maximum yields.

    Ability for In‐Season Correction of Nitrogen Deficiency in Corn Using Chlorophyll Meters · 1997

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    N fertilization did not significantly influence belowground NPP of corn.

    Nitrogen fertilizer effects on soil carbon balances in Midwestern U.S. agricultural systems · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Average grain yield of maize was reduced by 37% at low N (no N fertilizer) compared with high N.

    Improving Nitrogen‐Use Efficiency in European Maize · 2003 · compared with HN

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    2 t pm/ha + 30-20-20 kg NPK/ha gave maize biomass and grain yields similar to 4 t pm/ha.

    Poultry manure effect on growth and yield of maize · 2009 · compared with 4 t pm/ha

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Maize yields did not respond to P fertilization.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil and roots respond differently to phosphorus inputs in an intensively managed calcareous agricultural soil · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    More N fertilizer on the previous small-grain crop rarely increased spring soil nitrate or corn yield.

    Soil Nitrate Accumulation and Corn Response to Preceding Small‐Grain Fertilization and Cover Crops · 1999

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Starter fertilizer did not increase yield.

    Corn Yield is Equal in Conventional, Reduced, and No Tillage after 20 Years · 1996

    Opposite direction

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.