Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation was the main cause of increased yield in both wheat cultivars.

A claim from Main Stem and Tiller Contribution to Wheat Cultivars Yield Under Different Irrigation Regimes · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation was the main cause of increased yield in both wheat cultivars.

Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
normal field conditionse2
Setting
Londrina, PR, Brazile2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Main stem grain yield responded positively and significantly to irrigation which was the main cause of increased yield in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–837
e2

“The present study was carried out to determine the contribution of main stems and tillers to the total yield of two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.), Cocoraque and BH-1146, under two water treatments: a) normal field conditions, and; b) irrigation, in Londrina, PR, Brazil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–279

Title

Main Stem and Tiller Contribution to Wheat Cultivars Yield Under Different Irrigation Regimes

Deonisio Destro; Édison Miglioranza; Carlos Alberto Arrabal Arias; et al. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2001. doi:10.1590/s1516-89132001000400001

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-bbbd8a9bf2dc7c0b6c895394f519ffc5b6b16b16491390ebd43035dcb02bacd6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.