Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dual AMF and PGPR inoculation increased pigeon pea grain yield more effectively than single inoculation.

A claim from Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual AMF and PGPR inoculation increased pigeon pea grain yield more effectively than single inoculation.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
dual inoculation of AMF+PGPRe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single inoculatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of AMF+PGPR to finger millet and pigeon pea crops showed increased grain yields more effectively than single inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–856

Title

Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input

Natarajan Mathimaran; Sekar Jegan; Matadadoddi Nanjundegowda Thimmegowda; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2020. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00088

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bc2a20a7ed43daca8426190efc77c55695364e3f1ef6de1367784c4c5f411614 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.