Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biofertilizer application increased combined intercropped grain yields by up to +128%.

A claim from Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer application increased combined intercropped grain yields by up to +128%.

Taxon
finger millet and pigeon peaCajanus cajanEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
biofertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
combined grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+128%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined grain yields of finger millet and pigeon pea in intercropping increased up to +128% due to the biofertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–997

Title

Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input

Natarajan Mathimaran; Sekar Jegan; Matadadoddi Nanjundegowda Thimmegowda; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2020. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00088

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e3823a9701b232fb9b4461df9d7a2ffc796fdebc20c0267544f358c2d2a0a268 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.