Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The INM7 combination produced the highest grain yield, 3.95 t ha−1.

A claim from Integrated Nutrient Management to Improve Finger Millet Productivity and Soil Conditions in Hilly Region of Eastern India · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The INM7 combination produced the highest grain yield, 3.95 t ha−1.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), Gliricidia at 2.5 t ha−1, and 2.5 kg ha−1 each of Azotobactor and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB) as soil inoculants (INM7)e6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
3.95 t ha−1e6
Setting
Malipungar watershed in the Koraput district of Odisha, Indiae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an experiment was conducted on farmer's field for three years (2002−2004) at Malipungar watershed in the Koraput district of Odisha, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–338
e1

“crops, such as finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–179
e6

“Overall, the treatment receiving 50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), Gliricidia at 2.5 t ha−1, and 2.5 kg ha−1 each of Azotobactor and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB) as soil inoculants (INM7) produced the highest grain yield (3.95 t ha−1), net returns (US$ 400 ha−1), and highest benefit:cost ratio (2.39)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1515

Title

Integrated Nutrient Management to Improve Finger Millet Productivity and Soil Conditions in Hilly Region of Eastern India

Anchal Dass; S. Sudhishri; N. K. Lenka Journal of Crop Improvement 2013. doi:10.1080/15427528.2013.800828

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-712a7f7e7477d511eca7bbfbe3aa1c3600785794bff18e897fb5bb23b3194900 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Gliricidia · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.