inoculation · Yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)

Positive and negative results16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.

Positive result
Negative result or no effect
Citation, pointing to the cited paper
Citation across the two sides
Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 13

Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza in the Productivity of Maize and Fingermillet Relay Cropping System · 1970
- positive
  Fingermillet yield responded positively but not significantly to AM inoculation.
Intrgrated nutrient management in direct sown rainfed fingermillet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) · 2002
- positive
  Integrated nutrient management (recommended N, 50% of P and K, biofertilizer seed inoculation) recorded higher yield attributes and yield in direct sown finger millet.
Production potential of finger millet and Frenchbean intercropping under rainfed conditions of Uttarakhand · 2010
- positive
  Vermicompost, wild apricot cake and seed inoculation yielded 21.28 q/ha in 2008 and was at par with NPK.
  compared with recommended dose of NPK
- positive
  Vermicompost, wild apricot cake and seed inoculation yielded 20.63 q/ha in 2007 and was at par with NPK.
  compared with recommended dose of NPK
Integrated Nutrient Management to Improve Finger Millet Productivity and Soil Conditions in Hilly Region of Eastern India · 2013
Combined effects of rhizo-competitive rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere Bacillus in plant growth promotion and yield improvement of Eleusine coracana (Ragi) · 2019
- positive
  The rhizobacterial consortium increased ragi grain yield by 37.87% in pot and field trials.
Evaluation of Native AMF Population for Drought Stress Ameliorating Potential in Finger Millet · 2019
- positive
  Native mycorrhizal inoculation enhanced finger millet biomass versus non-mycorrhizal plants regardless of soil water status.
  compared with non-mycorrhizal finger millet plants
Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input · 2020
- positive
  Dual AMF and PGPR inoculation increased finger millet grain yield more effectively than single inoculation.
  compared with single inoculation
- positive
  Biofertilizer application increased combined intercropped grain yields by up to +128%.
cites 1 paper here
Yield and economic of Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) as influenced by organic sources and biofertilizers · 2021
- positive
  Poultry manure plus Azospirillum and PSB gave significantly higher finger millet grain yield than other treatment combinations, at 3.23 t/ha.
  compared with other treatment combinations
- positive
  The same treatment gave significantly higher finger millet straw yield than other combinations, at 5.5 t/ha.
  compared with other treatment combinations
Studies on impact of organic sources for sustainable yield and soil health in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) cv. CO 9 · 2021
Effect of bio enriched FYM on growth, yield and economics of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn) under dryland condition · 2023
- positive
  T10 produced significantly more tillers at the three sampling times.
Prospecting Efficacy of Native Bacterial Bioagents against Blast Disease and their Potential for Plant Growth Promotion in Finger Millet · 2024
- positive
  The P-9 and B-10 consortium increase in grain yield by 35.17 % compared with control.
  compared with control
- positive
  The P-9 and B-10 consortium highest in cost benefit ratio by 1: 1.53 compared with control.
  compared with control
The effect of liquid biofertilizer practices on the growth and yield of finger millet · 2025
- positive
  T1 produced the maximum significant finger millet grain yield of 23.58 qha-1.
Impact of Liquid Biofertilizers on Nutrition of Finger Millet and Residual Soil Fertility Status · 2025
- positive
  The combined treatment enhanced crop productivity.
  compared with RDF alone

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3

Root-Associated Nitrogen Fixation in Finger Millet · 1986
- no effect
  Inoculation did not increase yield or nitrogen uptake in the field.
  compared with the control
Finger Millet Growth and Nutrient Uptake Is Improved in Intercropping With Pigeon Pea Through “Biofertilization” and “Bioirrigation” Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria · 2018
- negative
  Without biofertilization, finger millet biomass under drought was less than half that under well-watered conditions.
  compared with well-watered condition
cited by 1 paper here
Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and integrated nutrient management influences the productivity of groundnut and their residual impact on finger millet · 2026
- no effect
  Rhizobium seed inoculation did not significantly affect some finger millet growth and yield parameters.

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

inoculation · Yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)

How these papers cite each other

Papers reporting a positive result 13

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3

inoculation on Eleusine coracana (finger millet) against other targets

inoculation · yield on other organisms