Paper · 2021 · Crop Research

Studies on impact of organic sources for sustainable yield and soil health in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) cv. CO 9

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Organic farming is essentially a soil-building mechanism to keep the soil ‘alive', make the soil ‘live' and sustain fertility. Balanced fertilization with organics, inorganics and biofertilizers have been proved beneficial in all the millet crops both under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Therefore, this investigation was carried out during Rabi, 2019–20 at farmers field in Pannandur village of Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu to evaluate the effect of organic manures (farmyard manure, poultry manure, fish waste, coir pith waste) and biofertilizer with 50% inorganic sources under irrigated condition in finger millet cv. CO 9. There were ten treatments involving T1-Control, T2-FYM @ 10 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF, T3-Fish waste @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF, T4-Poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF, T5-Coir pith waste @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF, T6-T2 +Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray), T7-T3 + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray), T8-T4 + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray), T9-T5 + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray), T10-Panchagavya @ 3% alone by adopting Randomized Block Design (RBD) which was replicated thrice. It was observed that significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha) (at harvest stage), LAI (5.34) at flowering stage, number of productive earhead/m2 (125.17), number of fingers/earhead (9.4), thousand grain weight (3.0g) and grain yield (3766.7 kg/ha) were recorded with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray). Considering the above facts, it was evidenced that application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray) have increased the availability of nutrients, thereby increased the growth and yield attributes of finger millet. Also, use of organic manures and organic sprays and biofertilizers minimize cost of inorganic fertilizers, thereby act as a boom to farmers by making the waste into wealth and maintain the soil health and fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher plant height of 122.9 cm.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
122.9 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher dry matter production of 12806.5 kg/ha.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
12806.5 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher LAI of 5.34.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.34e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha) (at harvest stage), LAI (5.34)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher productive earheads per square metre, 125.17.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
number of productive earhead/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
125.17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha) (at harvest stage), LAI (5.34) at flowering stage, number of productive earhead/m2 (125.17)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher fingers per earhead, 9.4.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
number of fingers/earheade0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha) (at harvest stage), LAI (5.34) at flowering stage, number of productive earhead/m2 (125.17), number of fingers/earhead (9.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher thousand grain weight of 3.0g.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.0ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha) (at harvest stage), LAI (5.34) at flowering stage, number of productive earhead/m2 (125.17), number of fingers/earhead (9.4), thousand grain weight (3.0g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The poultry manure combination produced significantly higher grain yield of 3766.7 kg/ha.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3766.7 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher growth and yield components of finger millet viz., plant height (122.9 cm), dry matter production (12806.5 kg/ha) (at harvest stage), LAI (5.34) at flowering stage, number of productive earhead/m2 (125.17), number of fingers/earhead (9.4), thousand grain weight (3.0g) and grain yield (3766.7 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1481 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the application of poultry manure @ 2 t/ha + Biofertilizer + 50% RDF + Panchagavya 3% (foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

inoculation · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.