Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined treatment enhanced crop productivity.

A claim from Impact of Liquid Biofertilizers on Nutrition of Finger Millet and Residual Soil Fertility Status · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment enhanced crop productivity.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
combining 100% RDF with liquid biofertilizer seed treatment and soil applicatione0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining 100% RDF with liquid biofertilizer seed treatment and soil application significantly enhanced soil nutrient availability, dehydrogenase activity, and crop productivity, comparable to RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–550
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–61

Title

Impact of Liquid Biofertilizers on Nutrition of Finger Millet and Residual Soil Fertility Status

Balram Yadav; Vikram Bharati; Tikendra Kumar Yadav; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2025. doi:10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i43380

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-18bb270ec627d9106af037b5e85b08d921c6702672e5ff88c3c892da1004f5c2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Seed priming did not significantly influence yield.

    Changes in soil micronutrient status by different nutrient management and seed priming and its effect on yield and micronutrient uptake of finger millet (Eleusine coracana) · 2021

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Trichoderma harzianum seed biopriming in HR-13 gave the highest number of tillers per plant (6.76).

    Seed Bio Priming for Enhancing Growth and Yield Attributes in Finger Millet Varieties (Eleusine coracana L. Garten.) · 2021

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Coated finger millet reached 12.47mg 10 seedlings-1 dry matter production.

    Effect of Xanthan gum seed coating on seed germination and seedling vigour of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) · 2024

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Finger millet plant growth and yield attributing parameters were significantly higher in treatment T10 (50% P, 100% N, 100% K, seed treatment and two nano-DAP foliar sprays of 4 mL).

    Optimization of Nano-DAP Fertilization for Improvement in Growth and Yield of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) · 2024

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The B. subtilis seed treatment plus Azoxystrobin spray recorded the maximum finger millet yield compared with other treatments.

    Combined Efficacy of Bio Agents and Fungicides for the Effective Management of Major Finger Millet (Eleucine coracana L.Gaertn.) Diseases · 2025 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Seed treatments enhanced yield of the local variety.

    Studies on varietal response of finger millet (Elusine Coracana (L.) Gaertn.) production in Bhatwari Block of district Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand · 2022

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Custard leaf extract seed priming significantly affected ragi plant height, LAI and dry matter production.

    Enhancing Ragi Yield: The Effect of Organic Seed Priming · 2024

    Same direction

  8. positive
    T1 produced the maximum significant finger millet grain yield of 23.58 qha-1.

    The effect of liquid biofertilizer practices on the growth and yield of finger millet · 2025

    Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Without biofertilization, finger millet biomass under drought was less than half that under well-watered conditions.

    Finger Millet Growth and Nutrient Uptake Is Improved in Intercropping With Pigeon Pea Through “Biofertilization” and “Bioirrigation” Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria · 2018 · compared with well-watered condition

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Inoculation did not increase yield or nitrogen uptake in the field.

    Root-Associated Nitrogen Fixation in Finger Millet · 1986 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Rhizobium seed inoculation did not significantly affect some finger millet growth and yield parameters.

    Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and integrated nutrient management influences the productivity of groundnut and their residual impact on finger millet · 2026

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Dual AMF and PGPR inoculation increased finger millet grain yield more effectively than single inoculation.

    Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input · 2020 · compared with single inoculation

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The INM7 combination produced the highest grain yield, 3.95 t ha−1.

    Integrated Nutrient Management to Improve Finger Millet Productivity and Soil Conditions in Hilly Region of Eastern India · 2013

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The rhizobacterial consortium increased ragi grain yield by 37.87% in pot and field trials.

    Combined effects of rhizo-competitive rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere Bacillus in plant growth promotion and yield improvement of Eleusine coracana (Ragi) · 2019

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Fingermillet yield responded positively but not significantly to AM inoculation.

    Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza in the Productivity of Maize and Fingermillet Relay Cropping System · 1970

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Vermicompost, wild apricot cake and seed inoculation yielded 20.63 q/ha in 2007 and was at par with NPK.

    Production potential of finger millet and Frenchbean intercropping under rainfed conditions of Uttarakhand · 2010 · compared with recommended dose of NPK

    Same direction

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    The 125 % RFD treatment yielded about 7 % less than GreenSeeker nutrient management.

    Can site-specific nutrient management improve the productivity and resource use efficiency of climate-resilient finger millet in calcareous soils in India? · 2024 · compared with GreenSeeker-based nutrient management

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    The RDF and control treatments gave significantly lower growth and yield attributes in finger millet.

    Influence of site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) in Vertisols under irrigated condition · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Effective tillers per plant were not affected by fertilizer.

    Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia · 2025

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Early maturing soybean preceding finger millet with 3 t FYM/ha and low P could enhance millet yield in short rainy seasons.

    The Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Yield of Two Contrasting Soybean Varieties and Residual Nutrient Effects on a Subsequent Finger Millet Crop · 2017

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Combined P and manure application gave the highest yields.

    Prospects and constraints of finger millet production in Eastern Uganda · 1999

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Higher grain and straw yields of finger millet, maize and cowpea were recorded with 10 t FYM ha-1 plus 100% NPK continuously, followed by 150% NPK.

    Microbial population and biomass in rhizosphere as influenced by continuous intensive cultivation and fertilization in an inceptisol · 2004

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The recommended package increased grain yield by 31% in 2015–2016 versus farmers’ practice.

    Finger Millet in Tribal Farming Systems Contributes to Increased Availability of Nutritious Food at Household Level: Insights from India · 2019 · compared with farmers’ practice

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The recommended NPK plus FYM produced the highest finger millet yield.

    Effect of integrated use of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on organic carbon, available N, P and K in sustaining productivity of groundnut-finger millet cropping system · 2005

    Same direction

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.