Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vermicompost, wild apricot cake and seed inoculation yielded 21.28 q/ha in 2008 and was at par with NPK.

A claim from Production potential of finger millet and Frenchbean intercropping under rainfed conditions of Uttarakhand · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, wild apricot cake and seed inoculation yielded 21.28 q/ha in 2008 and was at par with NPK.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Vermicompost + wild apricot cake (50% N from each source) + seed inoculatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
at pare0
Value
21.28 q/hae0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
recommended dose of NPKe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–37
e0

“Vermicompost + wild apricot cake (50% N from each source) + seed inoculation (20.63 and 21.28 q/ha during 2007 and 2008, respectively) which was at par with recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–937
e1

“grain yields (21.59 and 22.46 during 2007 and 2008, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–744

Title

Production potential of finger millet and Frenchbean intercropping under rainfed conditions of Uttarakhand

Rashmi Yadav Journal of Food Legumes 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-950f2c7aaaaf7e09a5a92950104de916562fa620861e03ff4b48b63ce15972fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.