Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Freezing and thawing nonburned October sods improved subsequently sown wheat growth.

A claim from Influence of field burning and soil treatments on growth of wheat after Kentucky bluegrass, and effect of Rhizoctonia cerealis on bluegrass emergence and growth · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing and thawing nonburned October sods improved subsequently sown wheat growth.

Treatment
Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 he0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
nonburned sods collected in Octobere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 h, of burned and nonburned sods collected in October, followed by thawing also improved the growth of wheat subsequently sown directly into these sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1199

Title

Influence of field burning and soil treatments on growth of wheat after Kentucky bluegrass, and effect of Rhizoctonia cerealis on bluegrass emergence and growth

M. MAZZOLA; T. E. JOHNSON; R. J. COOK Plant Pathology 1997. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-71.x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-bc65b975f60fdd88adb3a471fdd279f4ae09b31ba2ba3c50544c860d08a5c7e7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

cold · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 34 positive, 54 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 52 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.