Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MS-CIM with 2.0 mg-1 2,4,D gave the highest callus induction percentage.

A claim from High Efficiency In vitro Whole Plant Regeneration via Desiccated Callus in Oryza sativa cv. MTU1010 · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS-CIM with 2.0 mg-1 2,4,D gave the highest callus induction percentage.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
MS-CIM medium with 2.0 mg-1 2,4, De0
Outcome
callus induction percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MS-CIM medium with 2.0 mg-1 2,4, D showed the highest callus induction percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1103
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87

Title

High Efficiency In vitro Whole Plant Regeneration via Desiccated Callus in Oryza sativa cv. MTU1010

Anjana Priyadarshani Kanathala; Srinivas Naik Kethavath; Prashanth Bollempally; et al. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) 2024. doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24mar1492

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-bdcf1fa6430c2c7532f2c11f8f334b409e40583e966a1ee689e41313ca55d2e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

in vitro · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 140 positive, 25 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.