Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Second season irrigation significantly increased straw yield.

A claim from THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION TIMING ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WINTER WHEAT · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second season irrigation significantly increased straw yield.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0e1e2
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0e1e2
Outcome
straw yieldse0e1e2
Direction
positivee0e1e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second cropping season resulted in a positive, significant response of straw yields to irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1006
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–189
e2

“The second cropping season resulted in a positive, significant response of straw yields to irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1006

Title

THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION TIMING ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WINTER WHEAT

M. L. HOOKER; S. H. MOHIUDDIN; E. T. KANEMASU Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-104

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-beb8a76069fb60e21724911cbb667add169f8951e625a3819cda4bc0fcae754b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.