Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yields did not differ between conventional and no till in any rotation.
Glycine maxNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields did not differ between CT and NT for either soybean or wheat in any of the rotations.”
Title
Tillage and crop rotation effects on the yield of corn, soybean and wheat in eastern Canada
Malcolm John Morrison; Elroy R. Cober; Ed Gregorich; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1139/cjps-2016-0407
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect New no till corn yielded significantly more than established no till corn in the first transition year.
- Observation Soybean had no transition effect from conventional to no till.
- Observation Wheat had no transition effect from conventional to no till.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage corn yield was about 20% higher than no till corn, without statistical significance.
- Intervention effect Wheat yields did not differ between conventional and no till in any rotation.
- Intervention effect Wheat yielded 22% more in rotation than monoculture.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage corn yielded 8% more in rotation than monoculture.
- Intervention effect Soybean yield did not differ between rotation and monoculture.
- Intervention effect Rotation crop order produced no significant yield differences.
- Recommendation An economic, agronomic, or environmental advantage is needed to justify no till corn production in high yielding humid continental environments.