Paper · 2007 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Monitoring corn and soybean agroecosystems after establishing no-tillage practices in Québec, Canada

Joann K Whalen; Shiv O Prasher; Hicham Benslim

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The conversion to no-tillage (NT) may seem risky to some producers who rely on tillage to control weeds, some insect pests and disease-causing pathogens that can reduce crop yield. Weeds, arthropods, and disease incidence were monitored in silage corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) agroecosystems with CT and newly established NT plots in Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec. During the first 2 establishment years, there were more annual grass and fewer annual broadleaf weeds in NT than in CT plots, but the surface area covered by weeds (broadleaf,grasses and perennials) was greater in CT than NT plots. Foliar arthropods were more numerous in soybean than corn plots in both years, but were unaffected by tillage. There were more ground-dwelling generalist predators, especially Coleoptera and Carabidae, in CT than NT plots, while spiders and harvestmen (Araneae and Opiliones) were dominant in NT plots. Crop damage from insect pests and diseases was below economic thresholds, but 5 yr of yield monitoring (2000–2004) revealed a trend of greater silage corn and soybean yields in CT than NT plots. The reduction in crop yield after establishing NT practices at this site was probably due to rooting constraints from inadequate seedbed preparation in the NT system, rather than from weed competition, insect damage or crop diseases. Key words: Arthropods, crop disease, silage corn, soybean, tillage, weed control

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grass weeds were more abundant under NT than CT.

Taxon
silage corne1
Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
annual grasse0weed
Outcome
annual grasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CT plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“there were more annual grass and fewer annual broadleaf weeds in NT than in CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“silage corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual broadleaf weeds were fewer under NT than CT.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
annual broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
annual broadleaf weedse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
CT plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were more annual grass and fewer annual broadleaf weeds in NT than in CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed cover was greater under CT than NT.

Taxon
silage corne1
Treatment
CTe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
surface area covered by weedse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
NT plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“the surface area covered by weeds (broadleaf,grasses and perennials) was greater in CT than NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–618 · show in text ↑
e1

“silage corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar arthropods were more numerous in soybean than corn plots.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Interactor
Foliar arthropodse0other
Outcome
Foliar arthropodse0
Direction
more numerouse0
Comparator
corn plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar arthropods were more numerous in soybean than corn plots in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not affect foliar arthropod abundance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillagee0
Interactor
Foliar arthropodse0other
Outcome
Foliar arthropodse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar arthropods were more numerous in soybean than corn plots in both years, but were unaffected by tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground-dwelling generalist predators were more numerous in CT than NT.

Taxon
silage corne1
Treatment
CTe0
Interactor
ground-dwelling generalist predatorse0other
Outcome
ground-dwelling generalist predatorse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
NT plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“There were more ground-dwelling generalist predators, especially Coleoptera and Carabidae, in CT than NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–841 · show in text ↑
e1

“silage corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiders and harvestmen dominated NT plots.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Interactor
spiders and harvestmenAraneaeOpilionese0other
Outcome
spiders and harvestmen (Araneae and Opiliones) were dominante0
Setting
NT plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spiders and harvestmen (Araneae and Opiliones) were dominant in NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–921 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–300 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pest damage was below economic thresholds.

Taxon
silage corne1
Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
Crop damage from insect pestse0
Direction
belowe0

Verbatim

e0

“Crop damage from insect pests and diseases was below economic thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“silage corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease damage was below economic thresholds.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
Crop damage from insect pests and diseasese0
Direction
belowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop damage from insect pests and diseases was below economic thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage corn yield tended to be greater in CT than NT.

Taxon
silage corne0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
NT plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“a trend of greater silage corn and soybean yields in CT than NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield tended to be greater in CT than NT.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
soybean yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
NT plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a trend of greater silage corn and soybean yields in CT than NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1116 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 25 positive, 19 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.