Claim · model-written summary
Neither water deficits nor shoot regrowth after harvest had any effect on cane starch content at pruning.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultanina
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- water deficitse7
- Outcome
- cane starch contente7
- Direction
- had any effecte7
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultanina”
e7“Neither water deficits nor significant shoot regrowth during the post-harvest period had any effect on cane starch content at pruning”
Title
P.A. Myburgh South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2017. doi:10.21548/24-1-2147
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Water deficits during the early season tended to affect yield more negatively than deficits applied between pea size and harvest.
- Association Yield reduction was associated with reduced bunch differentiation, berry shed and smaller berries.
- Intervention effect Water deficits induced after flowering (T4) significantly reduced berry size.
- Intervention effect Water deficits had no significant effect on juice sugar content.
- Intervention effect Water deficits had no significant effect on total titratable acids.
- Observation No choice-grade sun-dried raisins could be produced from grapevines with water deficits during ripening.
- Intervention effect Significant browning of dipped raisins from TS and T6 grapevines occurred during some seasons compared with continued irrigation.
- Intervention effect Water deficits between pruning and budbreak significantly reduced yields compared with continued irrigation.
- Intervention effect Low relative humidity and dry soil delayed budbreak of Sultanina grapevines after harvest.
- Intervention effect Low relative humidity and dry soil stimulated excessive shoot growth after harvest.
- Intervention effect Cane mass was significantly higher under low relative humidity and dry soil than under irrigation at 60% PAW depletion.
- Intervention effect Water stress in the pre-harvest phenological phases was too short to significantly affect vegetative growth.