Paper · 2014 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Management practices impact vine carbohydrate status to a greater extent than vine productivity

Anne Pellegrino; Peter Clingeleffer; Nicola Cooley; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Light pruning and deficit irrigation regimes are practices which are widely used in high yielding commercial vineyards in the warm climate regions of Australia. Little information is available on their impacts on carbohydrate dynamics in vegetative organs within and between seasons, and on the resulting plant capacity to maintain productivity and ripen fruits. This study was conducted to address this gap in knowledge over five vintages on Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia. Lighter pruning did not change the total carbohydrates concentration and composition in wood and roots within seasons in Cabernet Franc and Shiraz. However, the total carbohydrate pool (starch and soluble sugars) at the end of dormancy increased under lighter pruning, due to higher vine size, associated with retention and growth of old-wood (trunk and cordons). Water deficit negatively impacted trunk and leaf starch concentrations, over the day and within seasons in Cabernet Sauvignon. Soluble sugars concentrations in these tissues tended to be higher under limited water supply, possibly due to higher sugar mobilization as photosynthesis decreased. Trunk carbohydrate concentrations markedly varied within and between seasons, highlighting the importance of interactive factors such as crop load and climate on carbon status. The period between fruit-set and véraison was shown to be critical for its impact on the balance between carbon accretion and depletion, especially under water deficit. The lower leaf and trunk starch concentration under water deficit resulted in a decrease of yield components at harvest, while similar yields were reached for all pruning systems. The sugar allocated to berries at harvest remained remarkably stable for all practices and seasons, irrespective of vine yield and carbohydrate status in vegetative organs in Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lighter pruning did not change total carbohydrate concentration and composition in wood and roots within seasons in Cabernet Franc and Shiraz grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Franc and Shiraze0
Organ / stage
wood and rootse0
Treatment
Lighter pruninge0
Outcome
total carbohydrates concentration and compositione0
Direction
did not changee0
Setting
Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lighter pruning did not change the total carbohydrates concentration and composition in wood and roots within seasons in Cabernet Franc and Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total carbohydrate pool (starch and soluble sugars) at the end of dormancy increased under lighter pruning, due to higher vine size.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
end of dormancye0
Treatment
lighter pruninge0
Outcome
total carbohydrate poole0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
due to higher vine sizee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total carbohydrate pool (starch and soluble sugars) at the end of dormancy increased under lighter pruning, due to higher vine size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit negatively impacted trunk and leaf starch concentrations over the day and within seasons in Cabernet Sauvignon.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
trunk and leaf starch concentrationse0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit negatively impacted trunk and leaf starch concentrations, over the day and within seasons in Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar concentrations in trunk and leaf tissues tended to be higher under limited water supply.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
limited water supplye0
Outcome
Soluble sugars concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
tended to bee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble sugars concentrations in these tissues tended to be higher under limited water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk carbohydrate concentrations varied markedly within and between seasons.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
Trunke0
Outcome
Trunk carbohydrate concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trunk carbohydrate concentrations markedly varied within and between seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1293 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The period between fruit-set and veraison was critical for the balance between carbon accretion and depletion, especially under water deficit.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
period between fruit-set and véraisone0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
balance between carbon accretion and depletione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The period between fruit-set and véraison was shown to be critical for its impact on the balance between carbon accretion and depletion, especially under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1561 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower leaf and trunk starch concentration under water deficit resulted in a decrease of yield components at harvest.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
harveste0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower leaf and trunk starch concentration under water deficit resulted in a decrease of yield components at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar yields were reached for all pruning systems.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
pruning systemse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar yields were reached for all pruning systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1741 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugar allocated to berries at harvest remained remarkably stable for all practices and seasons in Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon, irrespective of vine yield and carbohydrate status in vegetative organs.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignone0
Organ / stage
berriese0
Treatment
all practicese0
Outcome
sugar allocated to berriese0
Direction
remained remarkably stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sugar allocated to berries at harvest remained remarkably stable for all practices and seasons, irrespective of vine yield and carbohydrate status in vegetative organs in Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1947 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc, Shiraz, and Cabernet Sauvignon in the Sunraysia region of Victoria, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–558 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 3 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

54 papers: 38 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

light · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.