Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate suppressed horsenettle regrowth more effectively than glufosinate.

A claim from Weed and Herbicide-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Glufosinate and Glyphosate Plus Ammonium Sulfate and Pelargonic Acid1 · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate suppressed horsenettle regrowth more effectively than glufosinate.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Glyphosatee0
Interactor
horsenettlee0weed
Outcome
regrowth of the perennial weeds horsenettlee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
glufosinatee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate was more effective than glufosinate in suppressing the regrowth of the perennial weeds horsenettle and common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–994
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50

Title

Weed and Herbicide-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Glufosinate and Glyphosate Plus Ammonium Sulfate and Pelargonic Acid1

WENDY A. PLINE; KRITON K. HATZIOS; E. SCOTT HAGOOD Weed Technology 2000. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2000)014[0667:wahrsg]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-bf862ecc8b20c19d240571bcb9a07d6b0ba32632fdaae23a39c164fbf487ab8f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 42 positive, 14 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.