Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wine sensory analysis showed no differences among treatments.

A claim from Organic mulches slightly influence the wine phenolic profile and sensory evaluation · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wine sensory analysis showed no differences among treatments.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
organic mulchese1
Outcome
wine sensory analysise0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
conventional practicese1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“no differences were detected in the wine sensory analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–755
e1

“three organic mulches (grape pruning debris (GPD), straw (STR), and spent mushroom compost (SMC)) and two conventional practices (tillage (TILL) and herbicide (HERB))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–404

Title

Organic mulches slightly influence the wine phenolic profile and sensory evaluation

Andreu Mairata; Alicia Pou; Juana Martínez; et al. Food Chemistry 2024. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140045

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bf98f8a97b30e2e1e493e09c62777ea351958abbd886518f207fb7b92ff37467 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

mulching · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.