Claim · model-written summary
Contrary to expectation, soybean-rice and rice-rice rotation yields did not differ significantly in simulation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae4 - Treatment
- soybean–rice rotatione4
- Outcome
- yieldse4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
- Comparator
- rice–ricee4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Contrary to expectation, the rice–rice and soybean–rice rotation yields were not statistically significant”
Title
Simulating Soybean–Rice Rotation and Irrigation Strategies in Arkansas, USA Using APEX
Sam R. Carroll; Kieu Ngoc Le; Beatriz Moreno-García; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12176822
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Method / resource The modeled LAI correlated with observations with R2 values greater than 0.66.
- Method / resource Modeled rice yield differed from observed yield by within 2.5% in percent difference.
- Method / resource Modeled soybean yield differed from observed yield by 15% in percent difference.
- Intervention effect Reducing irrigation beyond 20% below the farmers original input significantly reduced simulated yields in all fields except one over-irrigated field.
- Method / resource The APEX model percent bias values were within 32% after calibration.